IFCCI
IPTI RESEARCH NOTE

Platform Fund Segregation Practices: A Comparative Study

RU0032026-02-18

Summary

Research examining client fund segregation practices across different regulatory jurisdictions and broker types, with implications for consumer protection assessment.

Key Findings

Fund segregation requirements and practices vary significantly across jurisdictions. Tier-1 regulators mandate strict segregation with regular auditing, while offshore jurisdictions often lack specific fund segregation requirements. Insurance and compensation scheme coverage adds additional protection layers.

Industry Implications

The comparative study supports enhanced IPTI fund safety signal criteria and highlights the importance of fund segregation disclosure in consumer protection assessment.

Note Details

Research Unit
RU003
Publication Date
2026-02-18
Topics
fund-safetysegregationgovernancebest-practice

Legal Disclaimer

The IFCCI Transparency Programme is an independent research initiative and does not constitute regulatory supervision, professional financial advice, or official compliance certification. All findings represent research-based observations intended to contribute to financial industry transparency discourse and informed evaluation. FinScope is a technology platform developed to support the programme’s public-facing digital interface.